Chatterjee v. King

280 P.3d 283 (2012)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P and Taya King (D) are two women in a committed, long-term domestic relationship. They agreed to bring a child into their relationship. With P's active participation, D adopted a child and P supported D and Child financially, lived in the family home, and co-parented Child for a number of years before their commitment to each other foundered, and they dissolved their relationship.

P never adopted Child. After they ended their relationship, D moved to Colorado and sought to prevent P from having any contact with Child. P filed a petition in the district court to establish parentage and determine custody and timesharing. P alleged that she was a presumed natural parent under the former codification of the New Mexico Uniform Parentage Act. P claimed to be the equitable or de facto parent of Child, and as such, was entitled to relief. D filed a motion to dismiss. D argued that P was a third party who was seeking custody and visitation of Child and the law prohibits a third party from receiving custody rights absent a showing of unfitness of the natural or adoptive parent. The district court dismissed the Petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. P appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the district court. It held that P did not have standing to seek joint custody absent a showing of D's unfitness and then held that presumptions establishing a father and child relationship cannot be applied to women, and a mother and child relationship can only be established through biology or adoption. It reversed the district court's dismissal concerning the opportunity for P to seek standing for visitation and remanded to the district court, instructing the district court to determine whether visitation with P would be in Child's best interests.