Carter v. Allstate Insurance Company
962 S.W.2d 268 (Tex. App. 1998)
Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Carter’s (P) car collided with a car insured by Allstate (D). P hired attorney Onwuteaka to represent them in their claims from the collision. On April 11, 1994, the attorney sent a letter to D for settlement of the claim. D’s adjuster made and accepted an oral settlement. D did not honor the agreement, and P filed suit on May 30, 1998, for breach of contract. D filed for summary judgment based on the Statute of Frauds. P contends that the oral agreement is not governed by the Statute. D claims that it is applicable because the alleged agreement was a promise by another person to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another person. D thus claimed that the agreement was in effect a suretyship agreement. The trial court ruled for D and P appealed.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co