Byrne v. Boadle Ct. Of Exchequer,

2 H& C 722,159 Eng. Rep. 299 (1863).

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Byrne (P) was walking on a public street past Boadle's (D) flour shop, and a barrel of flour fell upon him from a window above the shop, knocked him down, and seriously injured him. There was no other evidence of negligence. A witness saw the accident and did not recollect seeing a barrel being lowered by rope as the witness did not notice or see the barrel until it struck P. P did not present any evidence that D or any of its employees were negligent. P felt no blow and saw no warning of any type of danger. Another witness testified he saw a barrel falling from D’s but had no idea of how it managed to get loose. A surgeon also described the extent of P’s injuries. It was not disputed that D was a dealer in flour. D submitted that there was no evidence of negligence and moved for a nonsuit. The trial court ruled under a nonsuit and P obtained a rule nisi.