Alexander v. The Medical Associates Clinic

646 N.W.2d 74 (2002)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D owns land upon which its office building is located. Its property includes an undeveloped, open field that abuts a residential area. Unknown to D, P entered the field late one evening to retrieve his sister's dog. Walking in darkness, he fell in a ditch and injured his knee. P sued D claiming D was negligent in its maintenance of the property. D filed a motion for summary judgment alleging the undisputed facts established that the P was a trespasser and there were no facts to support a finding that the defendant breached its limited duty of care to a trespasser. The court granted summary judgment, ruling (1) as a matter of law, that was a trespasser, (2) the applicable standard of care was the avoidance of willful and wanton injury, not negligence, and (3) there were no facts showing d breached this duty of care. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2026 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.