The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D was arrested near a port of entry for illegally crossing the border. P contends that D attacked Agents Salzano and Kermes, who were trying to arrest him. P presented evidence at trial that tended to show that Agent Bush directed Agents Kermes, Salzano, and Martinez to a group of illegal aliens. The agents first attempted to apprehend the group, but D escaped, pushing Agent Kermes away. Agent Bush located three more aliens crawling through the brush and directed Agent Salzano to them. As Agent Salzano attempted to sneak up on the aliens, D struck Agent Salzano in the head with a rock. D fled directly to Agent Kermes' position and tried to take Agent Kermes' gun. Agent Kermes subdued D by striking him in the head with his firearm. D presented evidence that Agent Kermes lied on the stand, and that at the beginning of the incident, Agent Kermes pistol-whipped D as he was trying to escape. When D encountered Agent Salzano sneaking up on him through the brush - without using his flashlight and without identifying himself - D reasonably believed that he was in immediate danger of another beating. D's arguments were supported by the Grand Jury testimony of several illegal aliens that they heard D screaming that he was being beaten at the beginning of the incident. P apprehended twenty-two, illegal aliens, in the incident. P interviewed them and D alleges that these interviews contained evidence in support of a self-defense theory. D's investigator took the witnesses' statements. Believing that the illegal aliens were being deported that day, D did not file a material witness complaint. P failed to inform counsel that the witnesses were not being deported on May 29, 1996. The illegal aliens were ultimately deported to Mexico on May 31, 1996. P filed a two-count indictment and the jury returned a verdict of guilty relating to the assault on Agent Salzano, but hung on count two, relating to the assault on Agent Kermes. D appealed. D argues that the sworn, videotaped statements of the eyewitnesses in Mexico should have been admitted into evidence under the 'catch-all' hearsay exception of Rule 804(b)(5), now recodified as Rule 807.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.