The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D was indicted for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. She pled not guilty and then stood trial. There were five defense witnesses presented all of whom implicated D for the criminal conduct charged. D took the stand, denied it all, and even denied that some of the witnesses had been in her house. The government then rebutted with the testimony of a new witness who testified about buying crack cocaine at her house, and this transaction was monitored by the police. D was found guilty. D's base offense level was 22 but that was increased two levels because D perjured herself at trial. D was sentenced on the enhanced offense level to the low end of the enhanced level but it was actually the very high end of the unenhanced level. D appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed; every defendant who takes the stand and is convicted would be given obstruction of justice enhancement.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.