The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The evidence against Carillo (D) included the testimony of an undercover officer who claimed to have bought a narcotics-filled balloon from D. D claimed that the officer had misidentified him. To rebut, the government offered, and the trial court allowed, evidence of two other drug sales made by D. The other sales were offered as modus operandi to establish D's identity. D was convicted and appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.