Troppi v. Scarf
187 N.W.2d 511 (1971)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Ps were the parents of seven children, ranging in age from 6 to sixteen years of age. John Troppi (H) was 43 years old, and his wife (W) was 37. A physician prescribed an oral contraceptive, Norinyl. The doctor telephoned the prescription to D, a licensed pharmacist. Scarf negligently supplied Mrs. Troppi with Nardil, a mild tranquilizer. W took them on a daily basis. In December 1964, W became pregnant. She delivered a well-born son on August 12, 1965. Ps sued D for: (1) W's lost wages; (2) medical and hospital expenses; (3) the pain and anxiety of pregnancy and childbirth; and (4) the economic costs of rearing the eighth child. D moved for summary judgment, and the judge granted it. The judge declared that whatever damage Ps suffered was more than offset by the benefit to them of having a healthy child. Ps appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Rule Of Law
The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2026 ABN Study Partner