The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

P, 67, was earning a modest but respectable living as a travel tour operator, when D, a wealthy widow with assets in excess of $40,000,000, began making demands and allegedly agreed to support him in luxurious fashion if he would devote all his time and attention to her. P gave up his business career where he earned no more than $8,900 a year and became the ever-present companion of D. P modified his wardrobe to suit her tastes. P accompanied her to lunch and dinner, escorted her to the theatre and parties, and traveled with her on her trips to Europe. Over 5 years P spent well over $300,000 for her “Boy toy's” personal needs. It ended and P sued D on the alleged promise D would pay all P’s costs and expenses for a sumptuous living for the rest of his life. P sought $1,500,000. D again moved for summary judgment after discovery in that the agreement is too vague and is void for lack of consideration.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.