The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

James F. was a juvenile offender with latent extremely dangerous and violent propensities regarding young children. The County who kept James F. in custody knew of these dangerous propensities but nonetheless released James on a temporary leave to his mother's custody despite James' announced intentions to kill a child of let out. Ps, husband and wife, and their minor son lived in the City of Piedmont, a few doors from the residence of the mother of James. No one in the local community was alerted of James' presence, and within 24 hours, he killed a 5-year-old boy. Thomspon (P), the parents, sued the County (D) claiming that the death was caused by D's 'reckless, wanton and grossly negligent' actions in releasing James into the community; failing to advise and/or warn James' mother, the local police, or 'parents of young children within the immediate vicinity' of the residence of James' mother; failing to exercise due care in maintaining custody and control over James through his mother in her capacity as County's agent; and failing to exercise reasonable care in selecting James' mother to serve as Ds agent in maintaining custody and control over James. D demurred contending that Government Code granted D immunity. The trial court sustained D's demurrer. P appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.