The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Striggles (D) installed some vending machines. The Supreme Court of Iowa had ruled that the machines were gambling devices prior to D installing them. In a separate and later ruling a lower municipal court held that they were not gambling devices. D had letters from the mayor and from the county attorney's office which stated that these machines were not gambling devices. A grand jury decided that the machines were gambling devices and indicted D for running a gambling establishment. D was convicted of keeping a gambling house.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.