Smolen v. Smolen
956 P.2d 128 (1998)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Martin and Roslyn were married in 1970. In 1990, doctors diagnosed Martin with a brain tumor. In 1994, Martin started fading fast and to protect their assets from liability for extensive medical costs, they obtained a divorce on advice of counsel. The decree was entered, and the parties split their property with the house remaining in joint tenancy. They lived together for nine more months, and Martin was fading even faster. Roslyn got temporary legal guardianship of Martin without his knowledge and put Martin in a group home, and Martin was upset and got his attorney nephew from Virginia to assist. Nevada counsel was obtained and the guardianship terminated. A few weeks later in May 26, 1995, Martin established a revocable trust naming the attorney nephew sole beneficiary and successor trustee. A deed was executed, and Martin's interest in the Vegas home was transferred to that trust. A week later, Martin was incapacitated by a stroke and resided at the Sunrise Hospital. Negotiations with Rosyln and the attorney nephew were broached, but no compromises were reached regarding their differences. Rosyln moved to cancel the deed, and the district court issued the order. The attorney nephew appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner