D filed a complaint for permanent injunction against P, claiming it would be irreparably damaged if P were allowed to continue building her home contrary to deed restrictions. Without notice to P, D obtained a temporary restraining order on the day the complaint was filed, prohibiting P from further construction of her residence. The court set the amount of the bond as $10. The temporary restraining order was dissolved by the trial court. The trial court determined that a preliminary injunction could not issue. P then filed a counterclaim for wrongful injunction. The trial court and the Court of Appeals determined that under Rule 65(e), P's recovery was limited to the $ 10 cash bond. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.