The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Gaskin acquired property and by various deeds conveyed out several lots which were later developed for residential use. Land was also conveyed to Runyon then reconveyed and conveyed back again. The next day the remainder of the parcel in question was conveyed to Brugh with restrictions as listed on page 513 Rabin 4th. By mesne conveyances, Paley (D) acquired the property conveyed by Gaskins to Brugh. D then entered into a partnership with Midgett Realty and began constructing condos on the property. P sued to enjoin the violation of the restrictive covenants. D moved to dismiss. D's motion to dismiss was granted, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. P appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.