Roberts v. Ring

143 Minn. 151, 173 N.W. 437 (1919)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Ring (D), a 77-year-old man with defective sight and hearing, was driving down a busy street. Roberts (P), 7, ran into the street from behind a buggy that was approaching D from the opposite direction. Even though D saw P, he did not stop. D, driving at a speed of five miles per hour, hit P. P sued to recover damages from being run over by D. The jury ruled for D. P appealed. D claims that the charge was without error and says that as a matter of law, he was not negligent. He claimed that P was contributorily negligent for running into the street. P claimed that D should have been able to stop since he was driving so slowly.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.