Reynolds v. Macfarlane
322 P.3d 755 (2014)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D walked into the break room at his workplace, where his coworker, P, was standing in front of the microwave oven. P was holding a ten-dollar bill somewhat loosely in his hand. P was unaware of D. D approached P from behind and, without touching P, quickly snatched the ten-dollar bill. P immediately spun around and faced D. D then stated, 'That was too easy,' and returned the ten-dollar bill to P. As MacFarlane walked away, P struck D, splitting his lip. D asked why he hit him. P replied, 'You pissed me off.' Shortly after this incident, the two interacted with a larger group of employees outside, and the employees joked around and completed their break. The two men were together at an off-site employee lunch some days later, and on multiple occasions after the incident, with no issues. The incident was reported to a supervisor. P reported to the supervisor that the incident was 'nothing' and that any contact between the parties was accidental. P was given a one-day suspension without pay for striking another employee. P received medical treatment for anxiety, which P explained to his physician had resulted from difficulties at work. One year later, P filed a complaint alleging assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The parties stipulated to the dismissal of P's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. P moved to amend his complaint to include a claim for battery, which the court granted. The court found D to be more credible and ruled in his favor. It dismissed the case with prejudice. P appealed.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner