Ralls v. United States
52 F.3d 223 (9th Cir. 1995)
Facts
Ralls (P) attorney at law was paid by a client/fee payer to represent Bonnette at his initial court appearance and his detention hearing. Bonnette was in trouble and arrested for attempting to transport 300 lbs. of cocaine from Arizona to California. The grand jury issued a subpoena to discover who paid P to represent Bonnette, the amount of money paid, the method of payment, and the existence of any retainer agreement and conversations with the fee payer. P moved to quash, and the district court ordered P to testify regarding identity and arrangements but not regarding the other requests.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner