The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Plumb (P) sued Curtis (D) for building materials purchased by D. P had furnished materials for three houses on Simeon Plumb's order, and D admitted responsibility, therefore. P then furnished materials for an additional five housed also on Simeon Plumb's order, and D denied liability claiming that the materials had been sold to Simeon. P was allowed to testify that Simeon was a man of no property, so far as he knew (i.e., poor). The jury returned a verdict for P and D appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.