The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

In 1963, Muscatine County acquired the right of way for construction of a causeway and bridge spanning the Cedar River. The work was almost completed when a flood hit in 1965. All of it was completed when another flood hit in 1969. Both floods caused Phelps' (P) land to be partially inundated. P claimed that the construction by Muscatine (D) was the cause of their land flooding. The trial court found against P because their contention was conjectural and speculative as to when a flood will come again to the river and how big it will be and just how much damage it will cause P. P appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.