People v. Sparks

28 Cal. 4th 71 (2002)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Twenty-two-year-old Ana I. answered D's knock at the door of her single-family home. D attempted to sell Ana some magazines, but she was not interested. D asked for a glass of water, which she provided. D eventually asked Ana whether he could enter the house, and he did so. D sat at the dining room table, and Ana stood in the area where the door to the kitchen was. Ana eventually sat at the table and D persisted in his attempt to sell a magazine subscription. D then asked Ana whether she had a boyfriend. Ana revealed that she had broken up with her boyfriend. Ana felt nervous because she did not speak English well. Ana asked D to leave, telling him that she had to depart to pick up her niece. She had to repeat the request again as D did not leave. Ana got up, walked to the living room to turn off the stereo, and again told D that she had to depart to pick up her niece. D followed Ana to the living room, and she walked down the hall to her bedroom to find outdoor shoes to wear upon leaving the house. D followed her into that room. Ana realized that D was in the bedroom with her, standing just inside the bedroom doorway. D blocked Ana's exit, diverted her attention by telling her to look out a window, and then shoved her face down onto the bed, pressing a pillow on top of her head as she began to scream. Ana began to see white spots and had difficulty breathing. D raped her and then walked into the bathroom. Ana closed her bedroom door and locked it. Ana left the house through her bedroom window and walked to a school to meet her niece, who noticed that Ana had red splotches on her face. A later medical examination revealed the presence of defendant's semen in Ana's vagina. Ana also showed signs of petechiae (pinpoint hemorrhaging) on her face, a condition consistent with asphyxia. The jury convicted D of first-degree burglary and forcible rape. The Court of Appeal upheld D's conviction for forcible rape but reversed the burglary conviction. It held that an unsecured bedroom in a single-family dwelling was insufficient to satisfy the entry-with-felonious-intent requirement for burglary. P appealed.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.