This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Owen (P) guaranteed the debt of Tate (D) without being asked to do so. P was then called upon to pay the debt of D. P did pay the debt and sued D to recover the funds. The case was tried, and the judge dismissed the claim for reimbursement under the fact that the judge considered P a volunteer. D got the loan from Lloyds Bank, and the loan was secured by a mortgage upon the property of Lightfoot. P was in no way connected to this transaction. Miss Lightfoot became concerned that her deeds were being held by the bank and consulted P who offered to help her get the deeds back. Miss Lightfoot was a former employee of P. P then deposited 350 pounds with the bank and signed a form of guarantee which guaranteed the payment of the monies on the loans of D. P did not consult D about this transaction, and his only motive was to help Miss Lightfoot. The bank then applied the monies to the loan about a year later. P then demanded that D repay him and they refused. P appealed the lower court’s decision.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.