P was injured while being transported in Bang's (D) ambulance. The ambulance struck a curb, and a five-pound IV pump toppled from a shelf and fell on P's right forearm. P suffered bruising and continues to complain of pain and cramping in that arm, which pain allegedly limits his ability to practice as a dentist. Ps sued for negligence, alleging a serious injury. D demanded that they particularize the serious injury. P identified four of the plausible injury standards: 'significant disfigurement,' 'permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function or system,' 'permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member' and 'significant limitation of use of a body function or system.' D moved for summary judgment. P abandoned all of the cited serious injury standards except for the 'permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function or system' standard. The court dismissed for lack of evidence that P had suffered a serious injury. The Appellate Division affirmed: The statute requires a party claiming a partial loss of use of a body 'organ or member' to show that the limitation is 'consequential or significant,' and that plaintiff had not met that threshold. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.