North Dakota Fair Housing Council v. Peterson

625 N.W.2d 551 (2001)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Robert Kippen and Patricia DePoe tried to rent a house from D. D refused because the couple was unmarried and seeking to unlawfully cohabit. They married a few months later. Kippen (P) and P sued D, alleging housing discrimination in violation of the North Dakota Human Rights Act. The trial court dismissed P’s claim for lack of standing. The court dismissed the claim by summary judgment with respect to Kippen (P). It reasoned that North Dakota public policy disfavored cohabitation, and, based on the North Dakota Human Rights Act and North Dakota's cohabitation statute, D was entitled to deny P housing. This appeal resulted.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.