Facts
Obstetrix perinatologists were formerly employed by D, which was also an in-network provider for at least some of the relevant plans. Before Obstetrix Medical Group was formed, D physicians typically referred their patient-members of the relevant plans whose babies needed neonatal care to P physicians. Since forming Obstetrix Medical Group, however, they have referred their patients to Obstetrix neonatologists, who have treated the patients without compensation if the patients' plans refused to pay for Obstetrix neonatal services. P sued Obstetrix, alleging that Obstetrix's practice of referring patients out-of-network to its own neonatologists rather than to P physicians constitutes interference with Ps contractual relationship with the relevant plans and unfair competition. Obstetrix filed a motion for summary judgment that the trial court granted, and P timely appealed.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner