The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Rigney and his wife conveyed by deed the property in question to the Tacoma Light and Water Company, a corporation. It was to be used for the purpose of providing a right of way 'to conduct freshwater by ditch, canal, flume or other conduit for the supply of the City of Tacoma and its inhabitants.' The deed stated that if the property was not used by TLW or is successors or assigns, that Rigney or his heirs or assigned have the right of reentry and to reclaim the property. In 1905, the land was no longer used for water and was converted to a park. The Metropolitan Park District (P) was created in 1907, and succeeded the city in the management of the property as a park, with ownership being formalized in the district by deed dated March 13, 1951. In 1920, tennis courts for public use were constructed and have since been maintained upon the property, although in recent years the courts have fallen in disrepair and are rarely if ever, used. P brought an action to quiet title in the property. Ds counterclaimed for a breach of the condition subsequent on the original conveyance. The court granted P summary judgment and quieted title in P. Ds appealed. The only questions presented for our determination are (1) whether the grantee of a fee simple estate subject to condition subsequent may acquire title by adverse possession following a breach of the condition subsequent but prior to a claim of forfeiture, and, if not, (2) whether the lapse of an extensive period of time between a breach and an election of forfeiture waives or otherwise extinguishes the condition.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.