The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Pieret (D) executed a bond and mortgage to Mrs. Jackman who later entered into an extension agreement to extend the due date to March 7, 1940. The extension agreement provided that in even of her death before that date, the interest and principal payments were to be made to certain designated relatives. After Mrs. Jackman's death, the right to future payments were claimed by her husband and by designated relatives. The lower court ruled that the extensions were a gift and not an attempted testamentary disposition. This appeal resulted.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.