Mayhew v. Sullivan Mining Co.

76 Me. 100 (1884)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

Mayhew (P) was working as a contractor for the Sullivan Mining Co. (D). During the course of P's work, one of D's workers cut a hole in the platform near where P was working. This workman did not mark or identify the hole and did not tell P of its existence. P fell through the hole, causing serious injury. P sued, claiming D had 'carelessly and negligently cut the hole without placing a barrier or warning by it.' At trial, the court refused D's question of whether or not it was a custom to mark holes that were dug in the platform. The jury found negligence and returned a verdict for P for $2500. D appealed, claiming that since they were conforming to custom, they were using average ordinary care.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.