This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

H and W were married on April 30, 1988. They separated on June 14, 1997, after a marriage of 9 years and 1.5 months. The parties have one minor son, born in January of 1996. While married H and W bought a diamond using community funds. H used it to make a ring for W on their fifth wedding anniversary. W got the now diamond ring with a card referring to the five years and also congratulating W on her recent promotion. W testified that she considered it a gift. Only she had worn it since receipt. H testified that it was a gift and an investment, something that we both could enjoy.' James also testified that it was not his intent to give her a fifth-year anniversary ring and that the most expensive gift he had given Buff during the marriage was a Christmas gift that had cost a few hundred dollars. The court found that the diamond ring was unilaterally given to W at or about the time of their fifth wedding anniversary as a gift and that it was, therefore, W's separate property. H appealed, arguing that there was no written transmutation as per Section 852.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.