Lee v. Brothers
2021 WL 4652336 (2021)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P is an agent certified by the National Basketball Players Association (NBPA), the players' union. The certification agreement incorporates by reference the union's regulations. In September 2017, P agreed to represent Mitchell Robinson, then a potential NBA draftee. Three months before the draft, Robinson terminated his agreement with P, allegedly because Ds promised to buy Robinson a new Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck if he switched to Ds' agency. Ds are a certified player agent with the NBPA and the president and CEO of co-defendants IAM Sports and IAM. P alleges that in offering that inducement, Ds violated the NBPA regulations. There is no doubt that a $34,464.50 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 was purchased by Ds for Robinson. In the 2018 draft, the New York Knicks drafted Robinson in the second round. Robinson signed a four-year contract with the Knicks. His yearly base salary was well over one million dollars. Since 2018, Robinson has played center for the Knicks. P seeks to recover damages for that alleged violation under a number of different theories, one of which was that P was a third party beneficiary of Ds’ certification agreement with the NBPA. Ds moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the motion to dismiss.
Rule Of Law
The applicable rule of law for this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2026 ABN Study Partner