Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Kovacik (P) asked Reed (D) to superintend his jobs, and they would split the profits 50-50. P did not ask D to share any losses and D did not offer to do so. They worked together, and in August 1953, P told D that the venture did not make any money and that D contribute the amounts that P had advanced over and beyond the income he had received. D refused to pay. P sued D for an accounting and to recover the losses. P got the judgment for $4,340.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.