Kline v. Kline
57 Pa. 120 (1868)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Gabriel (H) and W were married. On the night before the wedding, H presented and read an antenuptial agreement to W. W was not able to speak English. As part of the agreement, W was to get $40 per year and a life estate in the family home. After 17 years, H died. Kline and Bean (Ps) south to enforce the agreement. W was 70 and without children. W alleged at trial H concealed from her his true financial condition and that as a result, she entered the agreement with inadequate consideration. W contends that it was P’s burden to show that she was fully informed of the nature and extent of H’s financial condition. The court held that it was on W to determine the amount of H’s property and he was not bound to do so because the parties were dealing at arm's length. The verdict was for P and W appealed.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner