The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Herring (D) executed a contract with Kitchen (P) reciting that payment in full was received for a tract of land for which a good deed was given. One of the defendants, Pridgen (D1) wrote the contract and was a subscribing witness. P was put into possession in 1847. D1 united with him and another defendant, Musgrove under a contract with D1 and commenced cutting down the timber, which was the chief value to the land. In January of 1848, D executed a deed for the land to D1, and under that title, P was put out of possession. P sued for specific performance, an accounting of profits, and for an injunction. P arranged with Musgrove to continue timber operations, and they agreed to account with the successful party.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.