Kinney Shoe Corporation v. Polan
939 F.2d 209 (4th Cir. 1991)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
Polan (D) created two corporations and constructed a leasing deal with Kinney (P). D was the sole owner of both corporations, he held no meetings, took no minutes, issued no stock and hired no officers or directors. D negotiated a lease with P using the first corporation (Industrial). Industrial then subleased its interest to D's second corporation. D personally signed for Industrial and the second corporation. It is undisputed that Industrial was inadequately capitalized upon formation and could not pay its debts. P filed suit against Industrial and obtained a judgment for $166,400. P then filed suit against D personally to collect this debt. The district court concluded P was damaged by D's failure to carry out corporate formalities and realty company's gross undercapitalization. However, it then concluded 'piercing the corporate veil' doctrine did not apply because P assumed risk of D's company defaulting.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner