Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

D entered into a written real estate contract wherein they agreed to purchase Ps' residence for $610,000. Several weeks after signing the purchase agreement and tendering $6,000 in earnest money, D informed P they were unable to consummate the agreement because of financial reasons. D submitted a proposed termination agreement, dated August 23, 1994, to P, whereby D offered to void the contract in return for forfeiting their $6,000 earnest money deposit. P rejected the proposed termination agreement and relisted the property for sale. P sold to another purchaser for $540,000. P filed suit against D, seeking damages for breach of the real estate purchase agreement. D filed several counterclaims against P and a third-party claim against Broker-Agents. The counterclaims alleged that P and their Broker-Agents misrepresented the fact that Waldin and The Vaughn Company were acting as agents for P; that P and their Broker-Agents were guilty of fraud; that P and their Broker-Agents were negligent; that the contract should be declared void; and that Broker-Agents were guilty of unfair trade practices. Broker-Agents also filed a counterclaim against D asserting that, as third-party beneficiaries, they were entitled to recover their real estate commission on the sale. The trial court dismissed D's counterclaims against P and the third-party claims against Broker-Agents. It awarded P $70,000 in damages for the loss resulting from the resale of the realty at a lower price; $300 for a heating warranty required to be furnished the new buyers; $1433 for a solar inspection required by the new buyers; $126 for a consultation on the solar system required by the new buyers; $2250 for interest payments on the first and second mortgages until resale; $17,156, plus gross receipts tax, for a broker's commission; $11,000 for architect and contractor fees incurred on a home P's had planned to build following the sale of their home; and $10,172 for interest claimed to have been lost by Ps on the net proceeds of the contract sale price. The compensatory and special damages awarded by the trial court totaled $112,748.94. In addition to the compensatory and special damages listed above, the trial court also awarded $33,000 in punitive damages, together with costs and prejudgment interest. The total damages awarded to Sellers amounted to $157,118.94, plus court costs. The trial court also awarded Broker-Agents the sums of $18,300, plus $1,017.94 gross receipts tax, for their loss of the commission and $16,448 in attorney fees, together with gross receipts tax thereon. Ds appealed.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.