Itek (P) wanted to purchase the assets of CAI (D). There was a conditional acceptance of a deal, and the agreement of D's principal stockholders was reached with an agreement to recommend approval to D's board and other stockholders. D's board approved the deal subject to four conditions; P obtain necessary financing, an informal letter of intent be executed, the detail to be worked out, and formal documents be prepared in satisfaction of the parties. P arranged financing, and a letter of intent was drafted and signed. Problems with tax liabilities prevented an immediate consummation of the formal agreement. D then revived negotiation with Bourn to purchase the largest stockholders shares at a higher price. P and D met, and P agreed to new conditions insisted upon by D. D then met with Bourns who was told that the P-D negotiations had reached an impasse. Bourns mailed an offer and D's largest shareholders agreed to sell their stock to Bourn. P was informed that the transaction was terminated. P sued claiming that D willfully refused to negotiate in good faith. The trial court determined that the failure to execute a formal contract absolved the parties from further negotiation and granted a summary judgment. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.