Interior Trails Preservation Coalition v. Swope
115 P.3d 527 (2005)
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D bought a parcel of land near the Skyline Ridge Trail in Fairbanks in 1997. After seeing a number of people cross their land, D posted a 'no trespassing' sign and erected a barrier to keep trespassers off. But some people apparently continued to cross over the land. Interior (P) brought an action against Swope (D) claiming a public prescriptive easement over D's property for recreational use. The complaint alleged that a pathway leading to the Skyline Ridge Trail passes through the D’s property and has been used by the public since the 1950s. The trial court dismissed the action in that D had only been in existence for 8 years, and it needed 10 to claim a prescriptive easement. This appeal resulted.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner