Interior Trails Preservation Coalition v. Swope
115 P.3d 527 (2005)
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
D bought a parcel of land near the Skyline Ridge Trail in Fairbanks in 1997. After seeing a number of people cross their land, D posted a 'no trespassing' sign and erected a barrier to keep trespassers off. But some people apparently continued to cross over the land. Interior (P) brought an action against Swope (D) claiming a public prescriptive easement over D's property for recreational use. The complaint alleged that a pathway leading to the Skyline Ridge Trail passes through the D’s property and has been used by the public since the 1950s. The trial court dismissed the action in that D had only been in existence for 8 years, and it needed 10 to claim a prescriptive easement. This appeal resulted.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner