In Re Eisenstein

485 S.W.3d 759 (2016)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

D was licensed as an attorney in 1974. D has been disciplined on five prior occasions. In the present matter, D represented Husband (H) in an action to dissolve H's marriage to Wife (W). H accessed W's personal e-mail account without her permission. H obtained W's most current payroll documents and a list of direct examination questions W's attorney had e-mailed to W in preparation for trial. In November 2013, H delivered the payroll documents and list of direct examination questions to D. On the second day of trial, D handed W's attorney a stack of exhibits that included the direct examination questions. Prior to this time, neither W nor her attorney were aware that H had improperly accessed W's e-mail account and delivered the information to D. H admitted that he improperly accessed W's personal e-mail account and obtained the list of direct examination questions and the payroll information. H admitted that he made notes on the list and delivered the documents to D. D admitted that he had viewed the information improperly obtained by H and that he did not immediately disclose his receipt of this information. On February 14, 2014, D sent the following e-mail to W's attorney: Rumor has it that you are quite the gossip regarding our little spat in court. Be careful what you say. I'm not someone you really want to make a lifelong enemy of, even though you are off to a pretty good start. Joel. P charged D with violating Rules 4-4.4(a) for using methods of obtaining evidence in violation of the rights of a third person; 4-8.4(c) and (d) for reviewing and using improperly obtained evidence; 4-3.4(a) for unlawfully concealing a document having evidentiary value; and 4-3.3(a) for misrepresenting facts to a tribunal. P held that D violated Rules 4-4.4(a), 4-8.4(c) and (d), and 4-3.4(a). It recommended an indefinite suspension with no leave to apply for reinstatement for 12 months. D appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.