Idaho (P) sent an inquiry to Westinghouse (D) for a price on a three-phase voltage regulator. D responded with a quote subject to the terms and conditions on the back of the quote. The terms on the back limited D's liability and included an integration statement. P responded with a purchase order stating its own terms, but those terms did not limit D's liability. P installed the regulator in June 1974, and it failed on July 31, causing a fire and damaging it and other equipment. D repaired the regulator at its expense, but P sought $21,241.52 for other damages under negligence, breach of implied and express warranty, and strict liability in tort. A summary judgment was given D on the terms of the contract. P appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.