Hurley v. Eddingfield

59 N.E. 1058 (Ind. 1901)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

D was a practicing physician. D was duly licensed under state law. D held himself out to the public as a general practitioner of medicine. D was the decedent’s family physician. The decedent was violently ill and summoned D by messenger to attend to him and tendered the fee. The messenger told D that no other physician was available at that time and the decedent was relying upon D for help. D refused to render aid to the decedent. There were no other pressing matters before D, and there was nothing stopping D from attending to the decedent. The decedent died wholly from D’s refusal to attend to him. The alleged wrongful act was D’s refusal to enter into a contract for employment. P sued D for wrongful death. D demurred, and it was sustained by the trial court. This appeal resulted.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.