Hogan v. Tavzel

660 So.2d 350 (Fla.App.1995)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

P and D were married for fifteen years. They separated and during reconciliations, D infected P with genital warts. D knew of his condition but failed to warn P or take any precaution against infecting her. The parties were divorced on May 8, 1990. P brought this suit in 1993. The suit was filed after the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Waite v. Waite, 618 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 1993), which abrogated the doctrine of interspousal immunity. D moved to dismiss. The trial court ruled Waite not retroactive and dismissed. The battery count was dismissed because the judge found that consensual sexual intercourse fails as a matter of law to establish the element of unconsented to touching which is required to sustain the tort of battery. P appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.