Hinds v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.

155 A.2d 721 (1959)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

P was a beneficiary of an insurance policy on his late father. There was no dispute over the fact that the father had died, but the jury awarded double indemnity. However, a blood test of the father shortly after death showed an alcoholic content of .267%. Evidence showed that the father was found slumped unconscious in a chair at his kitchen table. He was taken to the hospital and died without regaining consciousness. The cause of death was a gunshot wound to the head with all the characteristics indicative of suicide. The first witness called was the wife of the father. She refused to testify taking the Fifth Amendment. The police officer who investigated was prohibited from telling what the wife said to him during his arrival on the scene. That evidence was excluded as hearsay. The jury awarded double indemnity.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.