This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Daytop’s (D) health plan provided health benefits to employee spouses only to the extent that a spouse’s own health plan would not cover medical expenses. To get reimbursement for spousal medical expenses, all of D’s employees were required to provide written documentation of a spouse’s health plan. Henry (P) sought and was granted reimbursement by D for medical expenses related to her husband. D’s investigation revealed that D had overpaid P $760.53 as a result of duplicative claims. When confronted, an argument ensued, and P was fired for employee misconduct. P sued claiming she was unlawfully fired under Title VII because she was a black female. She claimed that D’s misconduct allegations were a pretext for firing her as she had not misrepresented her husband’s medical coverage and white male employees received more lenient sanctions for similar conduct. D moved for summary judgment in that P’s allegations were inconsistent and included an admission that she did commit misconduct. The district court granted D’s summary judgment motion.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.