Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Hampton (D) was an acquaintance of Hutton who seeing the track marks on D's arm told D that he knew where they could score some heroin. D went with Hutton, who had actually informed the DEA of a seller and met with agents posing as buyers. During the first buy, D told the agents that he could score larger quantities. They met again and this time D produced a larger quantity of heroin at which point D was arrested. D claimed that Hutton was the party who procured the drugs that D was selling and that D only thought that the drugs were actually fake heroin in a scam to rip off buyers. D was convicted and appealed; the outrageous conduct of the government agents should preclude a conviction.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.