Espinosa v. Sparber, Shevin, Shapo, Rosen & Heilbronne

612 SO. 2D 1378 (1993)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Roskin drafted a will for Testator. The will contained no provision for after-born children. After the birth of a fourth child (P), who was not named in the will, Testator contacted Roskin about including the child in his will. A new will was drafted but never executed. Testator later executed a codicil which made no mention of the child. After Testator's death, his widow brought a malpractice action against Roskin and his firm (D) on the child's behalf. The complaint was dismissed for lack of privity of contract. The Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal.