Escobedo's (D) brother-in-law was shot and killed. A few hours later, D was taken into police custody for questioning. He retained a lawyer and was released on a writ of habeas corpus. Eleven days later, DiGerlando, also in police custody, claimed that D fired the shots. The police picked up D again. D's attorney came to the police station and tried to speak with D. While in custody, D made numerous attempts to speak with his attorney, with no success. Instead of arranging a meeting between D and his attorney, police arranged a meeting between D and DiGerlando. Shortly thereafter, D made incriminating statements indicating that he was at the scene of the killing. He later made more damaging statements, and ultimately signed a statement prepared by an assistant prosecutor. D was convicted of murder. The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed. D appealed.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.