The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

E.A. (P) sued Gordon (D) on three contracts. D admitted liability but counterclaimed for a breach of contract to supply and erect structural steel on one of its projects. D was the general contractor, and it sought bids from subs of which one of them was P. P bid the project orally and then by letter dated April 22, 1963. Bids were opened on April 19 and D was the lowest bidder. D's contract was awarded May 27 and during this period D never accepted the bid offer of P. On June 1 P sent a telegram that it must withdraw its bid. P never performed and D employed Elizabeth Iron Works and sued for damages between the contract prices. D contends that the April 22 letter was an offer and that P had no right to withdraw it under promissory estoppel and or under the UCC. Summary judgment was given to P and D appealed. (The UCC argument was invalid because the signed writing gave no assurances that it would be upheld.)

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.