The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

O.D. was born to D on February 10, 2009. D knew that P was not the child's biological father, but nonetheless told P that he was. Based on D's representations, P provided financial support for the mother and the child. P filed an application in the district court to establish custody of the child. After D received the report of the child custody evaluator, she was afraid she would not get custody of the child and requested a paternity test. That test excluded P as the biological father. P requested a second paternity test, which again excluded him as the biological father. P filed a separate petition at law seeking reimbursement from D of monies 'expended to D, monies for the minor child, and monies expended in custody litigation.' D moved to dismiss the petition. D asserted that the State of Iowa does not recognize an action for 'paternity fraud.' The district court granted D's motion to dismiss. P appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.