David Properties, Inc., v. Selk
151 So.2d 334 (1963)
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Facts
P sold D a 320-acre tract of land. A purchase-money mortgage was executed by D to P to secure payment of the remaining $45,000, payable in annual installments of $9,000 each. P continued to live on the property after the sale. D had paid four annual installments but was several months overdue in payment of the final $9,000 installment. P sued to foreclose on the mortgage. After a time, d filed an ejectment suit against P, which resulted in the execution of a written lease agreement. P expressly agreed that he will vacate the premises subject to the lease and turn over possession of the same to D at or prior to midnight, December 31, 1959.' P did not vacate by December 31, 1959, but continued to live there from January 1, 1960, until November 27, 1961, a period of almost 23 months after the date set by the lease for him to vacate the property. About a month and a half after P was supposed to vacate the property, D wrote and stated that the rent would be $300 per month and that P must vacate immediately. About a year later the same exchange occurred, but now a bill for $3,600 was presented for the prior 12-month rental. D attempted to reconcile the final installment due with the monies P owed D for rent. P sued to foreclose the mortgage. D countersued for the $7,200 offset from rent. D claimed an implied contract based on the two demand letters sent to P. The Chancellor found that P was an old man who did not occupy the enter 320 acres but only a shack on the land and that D had not been injured. D had not been deprived of any income or has suffered any damage by virtue of such occupation. The building was no more than a shack, had no rental value, was unsafe and uninhabitable. Also, D had no use or plans for the use, rental or improvement of the building; and it had no value for use or occupation. D’s counterclaim was dismissed. D appealed.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner