Crosson v. Crosson

668 So.2d 868 (1995)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

Bruce (H) and Barbara (W) were married in 1982. They were divorced in 1993. After the divorce, H asked W to come back and be his wife. W accepted, but there was no formal marriage contract when they began living together again. H then married another woman in 1994, and W eventually discovered this and sued H for divorce and claimed that he had committed adultery and bigamy. The trial court found that W had failed to prove a common law marriage. The trial judge stated that there was a need to show strong evidence to rebut the presumption created by H's ceremonial marriage over a common law marriage and that such a ceremonial marriage rebutted the presumption of a common law marriage. W appealed.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.