Crosson v. Crosson
668 So.2d 868 (1995)
Facts
Bruce (H) and Barbara (W) were married in 1982. They were divorced in 1993. After the divorce, H asked W to come back and be his wife. W accepted, but there was no formal marriage contract when they began living together again. H then married another woman in 1994, and W eventually discovered this and sued H for divorce and claimed that he had committed adultery and bigamy. The trial court found that W had failed to prove a common law marriage. The trial judge stated that there was a need to show strong evidence to rebut the presumption created by H's ceremonial marriage over a common law marriage and that such a ceremonial marriage rebutted the presumption of a common law marriage. W appealed.
Nature Of The Case
This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.
Issues
The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.
Holding & Decision
The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.
Legal Analysis
Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.
© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner